Thoroughbred Handicapping:
Learning, earning and loving the track.

NetCapper Store
New Stuff

The Grandstand
Capper Demo
Spot Play Demo
New Features
Track Tracts
TTs Archive
Contact Info
More Books
Capper Email























Track Tracts

Half the Race is Out of Your Control (Part 5)
by Joe Takach


If a racing neophyte were to look at the past performances wondering what medication a specific horse was running on today, he would be offered no more than Lasix and/or Bute.

To those of us that have �been around the block� more than once, that�s already funny!

In most cases, Bute and Lasix account for only a portion of the medication, both legally and illegally, that any horse races with on any given afternoon.

I�m not going to waste anyone�s time defending that position because I positively know it to be fact.

If you choose to believe those �fairy tale� stories printed by the Daily Racing Form and by every state racing association as to how �clean� our game is, by all means dream on----it is much later than you think! You will soon be parted from your money whether a bettor or an owner.

It is no secret in the annals of horseracing that I�ve been bitching about illegal �drugging� long before the first time I was captured in print in the July 1985 issue of Gambling Times Magazine with an article entitled �Lasix: The Great Equalizer�.

Keystone, which is now known as Philadelphia Park, provided the background for my story about Lasix. Keep in mind that at this time, the Daily Racing Form wasn�t listing any Lasix horses in their past performances as they now do, nor was any other publication taking the initiative. If you wanted proprietary lasix information, you had to dig for it.

I might also mention that although Keystone�s track program listed horses running on Lasix, track management made sure to keep the public in the dark as to when it was 1st Lasix! But funny thing, just like �stuck� horses, that same track management had absolutely no problem noting 1st Lasix horses on the overnights that were plastered all over the backside!

Getting back to my Lasix article, the gist of my writing was that if you bet $100 to win on every horse that went 1st or 2nd Lasix at �Keystone� during the months of November and December 1984, you realized a healthy profit of $4,530.

This came about from betting 105 horses that went 1st or 2nd lasix. Of those 105 first or second lasix starters, a total of 23 runners won for a win percentage of 21.9%. If one were only betting $2, this would have translated into a healthy R.O.I. of $2.86.

I might also mention that this unbelievable profit came about without incorporating any other known handicapping principle such as speed, pace, trip, breeding, etc. The only thing one had to know was if a specific horse was 1st or 2nd Lasix! If he was, you put 100 bucks on his nose and got plenty �fat�.

Since I had been keeping track of 1st and 2nd Lasix from the day the drug first became legal, I was almost tempted to entirely end my daily 18 hour routines, that included keeping track of everything under the sun to assist my future wagering.

I was tired of those never-ending draining days, but they were needed in order to eek out an existence.

I wanted to live the �Life of Riley�. You know, sleep until 11, roll out of bed, shower, leave for the track, return home with handfuls of money, have dinner and watch TV all night instead of burning my eyes pouring over tomorrow�s past performances. How wonderful life would have been if the only thing that I had to do everyday was to keep track of 1st and 2nd Lasix!

It�s a good thing I hesitated, because reality was right around the corner.

I don�t know if it was a coincidence but soon after my article was published, much pressure came to bear upon the entire racing industry by race fans everywhere. And under that pressure, nearly all racetracks fell into line like prearranged dominos and began listing not only Lasix horses, but 1st Lasix horses.

And just as soon as they did, the 21.9% win percentage I enjoyed at Keystone suddenly plummeted to a little over 10% with an R.O.I. well under $2.00.

1st and 2nd Lasix suddenly became nothing more than another losing angle because the trainers �laid down� and ran most of their horses �straight�.

So much for my short-lived �Life of Riley�.

The purpose of this quick diversion was to show you how much a legal �panacean� can affect the outcome of any race.

Try to imagine the effect of today�s unknown designer drugs for which there are no tests!

Without any doubt, when designer drugs are administered, the outcome of the race is surely out of our control!


Many racetracks now inform their patrons of any track maintenance that has taken place since the end of the last race the day before.

But what does that mean to Joe Six-Pack?

Most likely nothing even though the changing of the racing surface can, and usually does, have a profound effect �bias wise� on the next grouping of races the following day. This could be evidenced by yesterday�s strong front-running bias morphing into a closer�s paradise the very next day or vice versa without any warning.

This is why it is often good advice to merely �watch� the first race or two on any given race day to see if yesterday�s running bias has changed. If you don�t and merely bet as if the running bias hasn�t changed from the day before, part of the race is surely out of your control.

Half the Race is Out of Your Control (Part 6)
by Joe Takach


Do you know how many jockeys on your home circuit ride while hurt?

I�ll take a wild guess and say every one of them!

Don�t get me wrong. I�m not saying that 100% of your jockey colony is hurt at any given point in time. But what I am saying, is that every jockey on your circuit at one time or another will ride knowing that he is not 100% sound and unable to offer his best.

Once in a while you can spot these situations if you are awake and paying attention, but most other times you can not. Consider the following.

The most recognizable situation comes about whenever a jockey comes back far too soon from a serious injury.

If his mishap gets written up in your local newspaper or in the Daily Racing Form, it will usually state that he or she is expected to be out for 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks or whatever.

The expected recovery time stated in the newspaper is not relevant. What�s important is the actual time that it takes for the injured jockey to return to the saddle. If he comes back as scheduled, he�s probably fully healed or close to it. If he�s early, he�s most likely not 100%.

It�s been said that pound for pound, jockeys are the best conditioned athletes in the world.

I�ve never subscribed to that antiquated theory. Furthermore, I seriously doubt that you could get any competent doctor to endorse such a ridiculous theory. Granted, jockeys are superbly conditioned sport figures, but are we to actually believe that they are in better shape than football, basketball or hockey players?

I doubt it!

Most likely this antiquated myth came about because nearly all jockeys miraculously return from their specific injuries much faster than expected. Football players can�t seem to do this. Neither can hockey players or basketball players!

So how do jockeys accomplish this?

Do jockeys have better doctors? Do jockeys possess better recuperative powers? Are jockeys intrinsically more healthy and in better shape than other athletes?

If you answered yes to any of those questions, they�ve been fooling you for many years and they continue to do so to this very day.

The only reason that jockeys return to their sport faster than any other type of athlete is the fear of losing their business.

They don�t have better doctors. They don�t have any mystical recuperative powers. And with their stringent and restrictive diets to maintain their riding weights, I can assure you that they are positively not any healthier than other athletes on non-restrictive diets. In fact if anything, they are less healthy than most athletes because of their diets!

When Laffit Pincay was on his successful quest to break Willie Shoemaker�s win record, a local newspaper journalist once asked him why he continued to accept mounts in 8K and 10K claiming races? With his riding tenure, didn�t he know that these cheap horses were more likely to break down during a race and potentially put him in the hospital. Laffit�s reply was an honest one that hit you right between the eyes. He fired back that �you can�t win races sitting in the jockey�s room�!

This is exactly what goes thru the mind of every single injured jockey when he sits on the sidelines waiting to heal. He can�t fulfill riding engagements sitting in the jockey�s room or sitting at home. What�s more, he doesn�t have any guarantees that another jockey won�t take over some or all of the business that he had before his misfortune.

So what does he do? He prematurely returns to riding after �getting by� the track doctor by saying that he�s no longer in pain and feels 200% better.

When doing this he might keep his business intact, but he rarely wins until fully healed.

Since I�m always in the paddock before a race taking copious physicality notes on horses, I�ve often spotted jockeys that were quite obviously not 100% physically correct. It might be the way that they walk or the fact that they�re sporting an Ace bandage on one of their wrists.

Whenever I spot these jockey negatives, it is either right after a spill where they didn�t take any downtime or soon after they return from a more serious injury.

Another way that you can learn about jockey injuries is by being lucky enough to be in exactly the right place at exactly the right time.

Some years ago at Santa Anita I was walking past Gary Stevens� agent when he remarked to another guy next to him that Gary took a nasty spill during morning workouts and injured his right wrist. He further stated that Gary was going to ride anyway.

Stevens had 4 mounts that afternoon, to include a 9-5 morning line favorite in the 8th race that I initially had planned to bet. I watched Stevens struggle thru his first 3 rides of the afternoon and I do mean struggle! It was obvious to me that he was merely �going thru the motions� and was far from 100%. I also noted that whenever he whipped a horse, it was only with his left hand.

When the 8th race rolled around, I knew that I had a bit of �proprietary information� that few others possessed. Gary would be atop a runner that was the type of horse that had to be kept to task the entire length of the stretch. He would have to whip both left-handed and right-handed to win the race! That just wasn�t going to happen! I decided to pass the race!

I have to credit Stevens. Even though he was hurt and in pain, he gave it everything and tried his best. He even attempted to encourage his mount right-handed when it was called for, but dropped his whip when he struck his horse the first time.

He finished a well-beaten 4th.

As mentioned above, I was very lucky that afternoon to overhear his agent�s conversation and saved myself a bad bet.

But most times, we are not privy to such information. At one time or another all of us wager on horses piloted by injured jockeys.

This situation surely ranks up there with other aforementioned scenarios to potentially make a portion of some races out of our control.


Copyright �2004 by Joe Takach.  All rights reserved.
Joe can be contacted through his website at

Track Tracts Archive

Back to Top